How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars
By This Book:
About the Author
Chris Stokel-Walker is a British journalist and expert in digital culture.
Summary
Google bought YouTube
in 2006. It now has 1.9 billion registered users.
Google started developing a video streaming
platform back in 2005, but start-up YouTube arrived first. YouTube focused
initially on building “reach,” often
to the detriment of copyright holders at the time. Clips of copyrighted material, quirky animations and home videos transfixed viewers, who watched vlogs – that is, video blogs –
of their favorite “YouTubers” and interacted by liking the creators’ films,
commenting and subscribing to
their channels. Google bought YouTube in
October 2006 for $1.65 billion. By
2019, it’s worth grew to $140 billion.
“YouTube is like a video encyclopedia, the
sum of human knowledge in easily digestible form.”
YouTube’s user content represents a paradigm shift for
the production industry. In 2007, YouTube expanded globally and launched an ad revenue program that enabled YouTube broadcasters to make a living.
Creators from 90 countries now
receive revenue from YouTube. Being a
YouTube “influencer,” a person who continually uploads video content that others want to see, is an enterprise many people aspire to join. Users already upload approximately 576,000 hours of content daily from
all but three countries;: North
Korea, China and Iran block YouTube.
YouTube’s algorithm drives the platform.
Its recommend function
dramatically increases viewing time.
YouTube’s
algorithm entices viewers to watch the next video it recommends. This has
increased time spent on the platform by
20 times since 2015. But creators face a variety of issues. For
instance, YouTube changes the rules often, which frustrates people trying to
build a business on the channel.
Tweaks to the code can throw videos out of the recommending algorithm, which means those
creators lose money. In April 2018, a
38-year-old Iranian, Nasim Aghdam, shot at YouTube employees
outside the company’s headquarters,
claiming that its changes to the algorithms had discriminated against her. She wounded
three workers before killing herself.
“It’s now too late to do much about YouTube’s worst legacy: the creation of a generation
with a distrust of commonly held beliefs.”
To add to the confusion
about finding and posting the
content you want, creators sometimes remake similar content to replicate past success. Fringe content also
thrives. For example, the David Zublick Channel reports that
former US president George H.W. Bush
was executed and that Hillary
Clinton died in 2016. In response to advertisers who pulled ads
when YouTube displayed conspiracy theories,
it has removed jihadist content,
child pornography and hate speech. As
of January 2019, YouTube said it was
tweaking its algorithm to avoid
recommending conspiracy videos. But, in YouTube’s lexicon, this content isn’t false; it’s “borderline.”
YouTubers earn ad revenue
based on video
views, which video creators supplement
with sponsorship and merchandising.
Advertisers track the hottest YouTubers
who post the most viral content. The crucial metric is average views per video.
Certain niche creators with dedicated fans are more appealing to advertisers than YouTube superstars
who’ve grown too big to interact with fans. If your videos break the 1,000-viewer mark, you’re considered a “nano-influencer.” Beyond 10,000 views and up to 25,000 views per video,
you’re a “micro-influencer.” Greater
than that, you become an “elite influencer” or “macro influencer.”
“Amazon statistics show that companies that connect videos to their account[s] get
30% more sales on their products; people are 10 times more likely to share a video
online than anything else.”
Singer Dodie Clark announced her bisexuality with a
vlog seen by more than a million viewers
within 15 months. A year later, she posted a “coming out” song
sponsored by candy maker Skittles,
racking up more views in one month than
her original announcement.
Advertisers and creators sometimes
collaborate to exploit such personal
moments for revenue, a more successful strategy than traditional
advertising and one that can
assure significant income for creators.
Being internet-famous made some creators
millionaires.
Jake Paul may be the most
successful YouTuber, with 17 million
subscribers. He annoys his neighbors,
who threatened to sue him for
disturbing the peace when he threw furniture into his mansion’s empty swimming pool and set it
on fire. Yet his YouTube fans love these outrageous acts.
Estimates of Jake’s income from
YouTube advertising revenue and merchandise
sales range between $350,000 and $5.6
million annually. Forbes magazine
reported that he grossed $21.5
million in 2018, before paying
management fees and taxes.
“YouTubers are 360-degree brands looking for opportunities and no longer just people playing with cameras.”
“Elite influencers” Joe Weller and
Olajide William Olatunji (known as
KSI on YouTube), brought their YouTube feud
to a massively hyped, sold-out live
boxing event at London’s Copper Box
Arena in February 2018. KSI won and then
challenged Jake Paul’s brother Logan Paul another YouTuber to a fight.
The event filled a 20,000-seat arena. Millions viewed the live stream.
Because people’s “rank on the website and the amount of income they can
derive from the platform depends on keeping their
audience entertained, creators can sometimes
feel trapped into making videos.”
Zoella, a top-tier YouTuber,
proved that her fans are willing to cross over to other media
with her first novel, Girl
Online, a bestseller in
the United Kingdom and the United States.
The highest earner on
YouTube is Ryan Kaji, an eight-year-old
who unboxes and plays with toys on his channel, Ryan
ToysReview. He also sells his
own line of branded toys through Walmart and Amazon. Canadian singer-songwriter Justin Bieber’s mom launched his career when she posted a video
of him singing when he was 12
years old. Matthew David Morris known on YouTube as pop singer MattyB started his YouTube career in
2014 at age 11. He believes that many parents have never heard of any YouTube
celebrities because adults still watch TV while their kids watch YouTube.
Infrastructure and support for YouTube success
is big business.
Tens of thousands of people, mostly teenagers, flock to California’s VidCon and other YouTube related events each year.
Obsessive fans are a problem for
YouTubers. Viewers feel they know their
favorite video creators and expect to
engage directly. This expectation turned
deadly for 22-year old singer Christina Grimmie, who had millions of YouTube subscribers, when rabid fan Kevin James Loibl shot her dead
at a meet and greet event.
With “the numerous scandals the site has been
the subject of, YouTube’s response can be summed up in one simple sentence: Its actions are always too little, too
late.”
YouTubers conceptualize and write their
videos, shoot them to look great,
perform in front of the camera, edit, post and market their videos. Celebrities who manage live events and sell merchandise need support
staff. For example,
talent agent Sarah Weichel represents Lilly Singh, a YouTube superstar with 14 million followers. Weichel heads “emerging
platforms” at Anonymous Content,
the entertainment company
responsible for True Detective and Mr.
Robot. In March 2019, Singh announced that she is succeeding Carson Daly to host an NBC talk show. PewDiePie is YouTube’s
most popular creator, but T-Series, run by an Indian
production company, is challenging
him. In many ways, content providers
are changing from independent
creators to corporate entities.
Scandals plague the platform as YouTubers
strive to become famous at all costs.
Prank videos play to YouTube’s
algorithm, which prefers shocking, “click-baity” content. Monalisa Perez agreed
to help her boyfriend Pedro Ruiz III with a daring
stunt. He believed that if she shot
him with a gun, a thick book would stop the bullet. But Perez’s shot killed Ruiz. She served
180 days for second-degree manslaughter and then launched a successful confessional YouTube channel.
“Authenticity” is an
essential ingredient for successful YouTubers.
One of the first
famous YouTubers was 16-year-old
Bree Avery, known as LonelyGirl15. She complained
about high school, parents and boys.
Then she began talking about a
secret group 'The Order' that was out to get her. It turned
out Avery was a character played by an actress, created by filmmakers trying to prove that scripted drama could thrive on YouTube. They gained Hollywood representation, but
LonelyGirl15 viewers regarded the truth as a betrayal.
Authenticity
is important currency on YouTube.
“Within a few hours, YouTube’s algorithm can plant the germ of a seed that
transforms a functioning member of
society into a loner who trusts no one.”
Social media users turn every
aspect of their
lives into content. YouTubers film in their
homes and often in their bedrooms. They speak in intimate tones, as if conversing with viewers. Fans form a “parasocial relationship”: They think they know the
creators because they know the creators’
lives. Celebrities who post
behind-the-scenes content, like Hollywood actor Jack Black playing video games,
gives fans humanizing glimpses of themselves.
“YouTube has created a new dynamic
between fans and stars. Creators
involve fans in achieving their triumphs, and fans feel a sense of ownership of those successes.”
YouTubers
can get overwhelmed chasing that algorithmic wave. Olga Karavayeva of OlgaKay shot
every minute of her life for upload, posting 20 or more videos every week. She
made about $100,000 yearly, but her time was
no longer her own, and she became less a person than a
personality. Unsurprisingly, she burned out.
Many creators feel YouTube doesn’t adequately value
them, so they’re abandoning the platform.
Hank and John Green the novelists and producers of the educational
YouTube channel Crash Course started
a union for YouTubers called the Internet Creators Guild. They aim to create transparency about earning fair rates from
advertisers and to establish
beneficial contracts among YouTubers, multi-channel networks (MCNs) and agents. MCNs claim to support creators in navigating business opportunities, but they offer little value to smaller creators.
“The super-charged growth of production companies, video editors and agents in this new age of individual
video makers makes Hollywood’s early years seem like a cottage industry.”
In YouTube’s early days, posting one video per week built a
steady following; now it takes three posts that are three minutes long or longer. Creators like Shane Dawson produce
multi- part series, and he’s planning
full-length documentaries. He satisfies viewer demand for content, but
producing so much volume is a
creative challenge.
“YouTube…provides more meritocratic opportunities in the creative
industries than traditional occupations.”
The crowdfunding
platform Patreon allows artists to raise
money directly from fans and patrons.
Subscribers pay a set recurring sum
that gives creators a predictable income. YouTube has copied Patreon, adding sponsorship choices, but
it hasn’t caught on.
Facebook, with 2.3 billion–plus
users, offers competition for streaming
video. Disenchanted YouTubers find it easier to build viewership on
Facebook because it rewards shorter, easier-to- produce “on
the go” videos. Facebook Watch offers video
content from major entertainment and sports outlets. It invests in original content and shares ad
revenue with creators. Amazon’s gamer
platform Twitch is moving into
vlogging content. TikTok is another
platform entering the video
streaming fray.
YouTube is
driving the change to more star-centric and original programming, hoping
to compete more directly with
Amazon and Netflix.
In spring 2018,
YouTube previewed YouTube Originals to advertisers,
hoping to reverse an advertising
drop-off. The original programming
offered longer formats, bigger budgets and name actors.
“Both fans and parents are beginning to recognize that,
as YouTube matures, the creators
they once thought of as friends are
in fact just brands and successful ones
at that.”
Actor Will Smith started his YouTube channel in
mid-December 2017. He credits YouTube with helping him “find his voice” and promises
entertaining segments and interviews
with other celebrities. YouTube posted a video called “Rewind 2018,” a retrospective
of the year’s video highlights,
featuring Smith and leaving out
PewDiePie, who had been a top creator for nearly a decade. In the video, corporate representatives discuss YouTube’s devotion to diversity and social responsibility.
“YouTubers are starting to act more like the businesses
that are trying to replace them in order not to be left behind by the race toward safe harbors like Will Smith.”
The video drew 15
million dislikes – not because people disliked Smith, but because he destroyed the parasocial
relationship between fans and creators.
Will Smith was a major Hollywood
star when he crashed onto the YouTube scene. He succeeds
there because he seems to enjoy the
YouTube aesthetic and remains open to his fans. Corporate YouTube loves the stability and respectability of vetted
stars, since every YouTuber scandal drives more advertisers away.
YouTube can safely promote
stars since they transform their platforms into a massive corporate presence. Hollywood stars also
lure older viewers, which helps YouTube compete with Netflix.
Younger viewers resist what they see as polished, fake
content. These fans like knowing that their support contributes to the success of people like Jake Paul, the kid from
Ohio.
More kids and their parents
watch YouTube videos on TV using
apps. YouTube’s algorithm tailors its recommendations
for them and offers endless hours of content. For a monthly fee, YouTube TV packages network content with its videos so viewers can watch on their own schedules. YouTube has a decade-long
head-start on its rivals and
a generation of viewers who grew up watching it. That makes YouTube a major
force in entertainment that continues to grow daily.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.